

The movie was first release in theatres on July 2, 2008, but the DVD was just released November 25, 2008. I personally liked this movie a lot, because it was different than the stereotypical superhero movies where they start out good and in the end they're still good. I think this one was more realistic, because everyone had hard times even if they are superheros. Hancock had an alcohol problems and anger issues. He
seemed more like all the rest of the people, but unlike everyone else he seeked help. In real life most people think they don't have problems and they just live their lives like it normal to hit your wife or drink until you can't remember what you did.

I think that because Hancock broke the norm of hero movies they should make more like it. Like with Batman, he's a normal man who makes himself super, but what if he ends up being addicted to some sort of drug or drugs. Even if they just give Superman an anger problem. I think a lot of people would like to go see those movies. Hancock was indeed my favorite superhero movie of all time. That is until Watchmen comes out next year. When that happens I'll have to compare and contrast both to figure out which one I like best. So, what do the rest of you think? Is Hancock a good movie because they give him real problems or should they keep all superhero movies the same?